Human overview · for understanding

Session Overview — Studio QA + Closeout (2026-06-25)

Studio integration proven live · friend-data deleted · the EBO×Visual-QA test doc began in parallel · 2026-06-25

Studio integration proven live · friend-data deleted · the EBO×Visual-QA test doc began in parallel

Master summary — the gist in 30 seconds

TL;DRThe Studio↔Pipeline integration is now proven live end-to-end (WJ-41…45) on pipeline v111; a small TDD freebusy-skip fix unblocked the live booking walk; the friend's (Kocsy) data was deleted on request; and a parallel session kicked off the EBO×Visual-QA test-doc (Phase 1 done, Layout A chosen). Everything is committed to local main 57e285anothing pushed.

Inputs: a post-compaction resume + your live instructions (delete friend data, switch to Playwright, build a test-doc, close the chat). Outputs: a deployed pipeline (v111, 900 green), live proof of the Studio funnel, a clean board, three closeout artifacts, and a preserved layout-design phase from a fresh instance that ran your handoff.

Why this mattersThe session moved Studio from 'built + unit-tested' to 'observed working against the real deployed system with a real Studio project' — the difference between believing and knowing. The closeout means no insight is stranded if you close the chat.
flowchart LR
  R[Resume<br/>post-compaction] --> F[freebusy-skip<br/>fix to v111]
  F --> Q[Studio walk<br/>WJ-41..45 live]
  R --> D[Delete friend<br/>Kocsy data]
  Q --> C[Closeout<br/>docs + handoff]
  D --> C
  C --> P[Parallel session:<br/>Layout A chosen]

1 · Studio integration — proven live

TL;DRA ZZ sentinel walked booking → deferred → save-URL → real Studio project on -rebuild → chip + Open-in-Studio → send-draft (human-gated, never sent) → lost → Studio archived. WJ-41…45 PASS.

Input: one ZZ test lead + the deployed v111 + the live Studio -rebuild API. Output: a real project (8e490d6b…) created, surfaced on the card, then archived on lost — each step confirmed against the live system, not a mock.

Why it mattersThis is the seam that ties two repos together. Proving it live (create + render + send-gate + archive) is what lets you trust the funnel hands a designed site to the client correctly. WJ-46/47 (approval/won) remain — they need real Studio Lab generation + a client approval click.
flowchart LR
  B[ZZ booking] --> DF[deferred]
  DF --> U[save website URL]
  U --> CK[studio_create_and_kick]
  CK --> PRJ[Studio project<br/>on -rebuild]
  PRJ --> CH[chip + Open-in-Studio]
  CH --> SD[send draft<br/>human gate]
  SD --> L[mark lost]
  L --> AR[Studio archived]

2 · freebusy-skip — the fix that unblocked QA

TL;DRA bounded TDD subagent added a ZZ-QA-only _skip_freebusy to handle_own_booking (production path byte-for-byte unchanged). Merged → 900 green → v111.

Input: a booking path that timed out the HTTP client at 60–90 s. Output: the QA hook skips the slow freebusy/Meet calls so the booking walk completes for testing; real bookings still check freebusy.

Why it mattersThe 'hang' was actually slowness that finished server-side — a finding worth a production follow-up (real own-bookings may be slow live). The fix is surgical and gated, so it carries zero production risk while making the funnel testable.
flowchart TD
  QA[qa/book ZZ] -->|skip=true| SK[skip freebusy]
  PROD[real booking] -->|default false| FB[freebusy check ON]
  SK --> OK[walk completes]
  FB --> OK2[prod unchanged]

3 · Friend-data deletion (Kocsy / scatter9920)

TL;DROn your instruction: 14 store keys deleted + 46 Notion pages archived (archive-not-delete). Board verified 0 friend cards; the 6 real client deals untouched.

Input: three friend email accounts. Output: their deals, booking markers, indexes removed from the live store; their CRM + activity-log + call-recording rows archived in Notion. External remnants (Fireflies transcript, GHL contacts) flagged, not auto-deleted.

Why it mattersA targeted, reversible-where-it-matters cleanup that respected the Notion archive invariant and the protect-list for real clients — so test/friend noise is gone without risking real revenue data.
flowchart LR
  K[3 Kocsy accounts] --> S[store: 14 keys<br/>deleted]
  K --> N[Notion: 46 pages<br/>ARCHIVED]
  S --> V[board: 0 friend cards]
  N --> V
  V --> SAFE[6 real deals safe]
  K -.flagged.-> EXT[Fireflies + GHL<br/>not deleted]

4 · What's next (a parallel session already started it)

TL;DRA fresh instance ran the closeout handoff and finished Phase 1 of the EBO×Visual-QA test doc — two mockups, Layout A chosen, live-transcript format locked, a journey-qa-overnight skill scaffolded. Phase 2 (verbatim full merge) is handed off.

Input: the closeout prompt. Output: plans/merged-ebo-testdoc-2026-06-25/ (LAYOUT_A/B + evidence + HANDOFF.md). Next: re-merge all 6 EBOs verbatim (every scenario, conflicts flagged) into Layout A, then optionally run the overnight pixel-walk QA.

Why it mattersThe pieces are in place to turn the funnel into a continuously-watchable, self-healing QA artifact. Open risks: 169 commits unpushed (your trigger), Studio not promoted to -prod (your trigger), WJ-09 design confirm, and the prod own-booking latency.
flowchart LR
  H[closeout handoff] --> P1[Phase 1:<br/>Layout A chosen]
  P1 --> P2[Phase 2:<br/>verbatim merge<br/>+ conflicts]
  P2 --> OV[overnight<br/>pixel-walk QA]
  P1 -.also.-> SK[journey-qa-overnight<br/>skill scaffolded]
  OV --> RISK[then: push? promote? WJ-09?]